Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 200/2022

Case between C.Krishnakumar vs Dileep Jose et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-10
Duration
approximately-3 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.Krishnakumar filed a suit against Dileep Jose and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of supporting documents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and did not provide necessary documents to support his claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present the case and provide requisite proof, leading to dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I.A 11/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.Krishnakumar (50 years years) ‘Souparnika’, Kannankulangara KERA 83, 23/233, Ernakulam – 682 317 C.Ramachandran (53 years years) Vanamali Apartments, 1604, B Block, Waman Takaram Patel Marg, Chembur East, Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400 071

Defendants

Dileep Jose (49 years years) Yogya House, Maradu, Nettoor P.O, Ernakulam – 682 040 Satishkumar (55 years years) Kamala Bhavan, Thekkevila P.O, Mundakkal, Kollam – 696 016 State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, 7th floor, Vankarath tower, Ernakulam – 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's application seeking to remove the case from the list was dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, I.A 11/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 09/10/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases