Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1552/2019

Case between C.K. Ullas Krishnan vs C.K. Purushothaman regarding compromise of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.K. Ullas Krishnan filed a suit against C.K. Purushothaman. The case was resolved through a compromise petition filed by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise filed. The terms of the compromise shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee, if any as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise petition was found lawful and not against public policy, and was voluntarily signed by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise shall form part of decree pending IA’s closed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.K. Ullas Krishnan (57 years years) 'Chemad House', Sreekala Road, Near E.M.C, Vennala P.O, Edappally South Village, Ernakulam - 682 028

Defendants

C.K. Purushothaman (58 years years) Embrasseril House, Kakkanad villages, Kakkanad, Ernakulam - 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise shall form part of decree pending IA’s closed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases