R.C.P. No. 155/2023

Case between C.J.Antony vs Pradeepkumar.C. regarding Rent control petition

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-10-18

Duration

approximately-6 months

Case Closed

Fri, 10/18/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.J.Antony filed a petition against Pradeepkumar.C. regarding non-compliance of rent payment orders. The respondent was ordered to pay arrears and provide possession of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court found that the respondent had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the payment of rent arrears. An order was passed for the respondent to vacate the premises.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court found that the respondent had failed to comply with previous orders regarding the payment of rent arrears. An order was passed for the respondent to vacate the premises.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to show cause or comply with the order for rent payment.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to show cause or comply with the order for rent payment.

Supporting Evidence

The respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 1/2023 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears is liable to suffer consequences under section 12(3) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.J.Antony
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pradeepkumar.C.
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Affidavit of noncompliance of Section 12 Order.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: S. Gopakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T.M. Binitha
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M.S. Kalesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Geethu C.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Evidence:

an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification