Case Summary
The complainant Christopher Perera Mark is involved in a case against the accused Beena Sulfikkar for an offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint. Accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Christopher Perera Mark
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena Sulfikkar
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Raghuvarma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Kumar G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint.
Evidence:
Allowed. Complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Christopher Perera Mark vs Beena Sulfikkar regarding offense under N.I Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Christopher Perera Mark vs Beena Sulfikkar regarding offense under N.I Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act