Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No . 75/2025

Case between Christo Sharan Bose vs Siju Mathew regarding a suit dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Christo Sharan Bose as the plaintiff and Siju Mathew as the defendant. The suit was dismissed due to improper filing of an undertaking and unpaid rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to failure to file an undertaking properly and not paying rent arrears. The consequences of a previous High Court decision were applied.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to failure to file an undertaking properly and not paying rent arrears. The consequences of a previous High Court decision were applied.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with court orders regarding the filing of an undertaking and failed to pay rent arrears.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with court orders regarding the filing of an undertaking and failed to pay rent arrears.
Supporting Evidence
Undertaking not filed properly as ordered in Order in IA 05/2025 in OS 75/25 dated 26.03.2025, pursuant to the decision of Hon’ble High Court in Pramod v Secretary Sultanpett Diocese.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Christo Sharan Bose
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siju Mathew
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. S. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.K. Nasseer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. K. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Asif Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Riji Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ayana Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjana K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mitha Sudhindran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is dismissed due to improper filing and unpaid rent arrears.
Evidence:
Hence the consequence of the decision in Pramod (Supra) will have to be followed. Suit is Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Christo Sharan Bose vs Siju Mathew regarding a suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Christo Sharan Bose vs Siju Mathew regarding a suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won