Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 300 OF 2018

Case between Chittakath Peediyekkal Kunhimuhammed Haji's son et al vs Kallingal Parambil Kiliyan's children et al regarding Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chittakath Peediyekkal Kunhimuhammed Haji's son, Padath Peediyekkal Alikkutty's son, Kaniyattil Jaffar's wife are plaintiffs. Kallingal Parambil Kiliyan's children, Krishnan, Kallingal Parambil Thupran's son, and others are defendants. Suit is for an injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs are entitled to a decree for an injunction regarding the properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Evidence remained unchallenged and plaintiffs proved their case.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as follows.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chittakath Peediyekkal Kunhimuhammed Haji's son (54 years years) Thirunnavaya amsom Thiruthi desom, Tirur Taluk Padath Peediyekkal Alikkutty's son (34 years years) Kaimalassery desom, Tirur Taluk Kaniyattil Jaffar's wife (26 years years) Thirunnavaya amsom Thiruthi desom, Tirur Taluk Others (Age not specified years)

Defendants

Kallingal Parambil Kiliyan's children (52 years years) Others (Age not specified years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction against interference with property
Evidence:
Plaintiff adduced cogent and reliable evidence. No reason to disbelieve PW1.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff No. 1 ownership of A schedule property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff No. 2 ownership of B schedule property
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff No. 3 ownership of C schedule property
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Certified copy of Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase Certificate No. 120/2018
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase Certificate No. 118/2018
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Purchase Certificate No. 588/2018
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax Receipts of the properties
Reference:
A7 to A9
Document Type: Copy of Commission Report and Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Way 'W1' and 'W2' in the sketch
Reference:
A10

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases