Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 471/2021

Case between Chinna S Karippai et al vs AmbikaRadhakrishnan et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Chinna S Karippai and Heera K.S, filed a suit against the defendants, AmbikaRadhakrishnan and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation. The defendants were also absent but represented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation. The defendants were also absent but represented.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. No proof affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chinna S Karippai
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o K.P.Sujathan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Heera K.S
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o V.H.Sunish
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AmbikaRadhakrishnan
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o Radhakrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, Corporation of Cochin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Edappally region
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sangeeth C.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alex Antony Sebastian P.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinod M.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas M Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alex M Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rejitha V.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chinna S Karippai et al vs AmbikaRadhakrishnan et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between Chinna S Karippai et al vs AmbikaRadhakrishnan et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won