Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 904/2018

Case between Cheruparampath Kudumba Yogam vs C. Gopinatha Menon et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-03
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed
Wed, 01/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Cheruparampath Kudumba Yogam filed a suit but was absent during the hearing. The defendant was present, and since the plaintiff did not provide any evidence, the suit was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to present evidence. The defendant was present during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to present evidence. The defendant was present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No evidence is adduced. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Cheruparampath Kudumba Yogam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Gopinatha Menon
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Sukumari
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa Sreekumar
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nalini Amma
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shyam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.A. Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sachin Jacob Ombat
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saju wahab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
However, plaintiff absent. No evidence is adduced. Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cheruparampath Kudumba Yogam vs C. Gopinatha Menon et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Cheruparampath Kudumba Yogam vs C. Gopinatha Menon et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won