INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1427 OF 1998

Case between Cherichi et al vs Chennakkottil Chathappan et al regarding partition

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

SMT. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-06-22

Duration

1 year

Case Closed

Tue, 12/31/1996 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by Cherichi and others seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for partition, but the petition was dismissed due to lack of cooperation with the Advocate Commissioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The Final Decree Application seeking partition was dismissed as the petitioner did not cooperate with the Advocate Commissioner.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The Final Decree Application seeking partition was dismissed as the petitioner did not cooperate with the Advocate Commissioner.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Not available

Judgment Evidence:

No formal final order found

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Cherichi
Party Age: 57
Relation: Wife of Kizhakkekath kunhikari

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chakki
Party Age: 62
Relation: Wife of Pallathil Chakkappan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Chennakkottil Chathappan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Chennakkottil Chatha
Party Age: 44
Relation: Daughter of Chennakkottil Theyyan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Velayudhan
Party Age: 45
Relation: Son of Chathappan

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Cherichi
Party Age: 60
Relation: Wife of Chathappan

Plaintiffs Documents

Not mentioned

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri E.M. Purushothaman
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. K.A. Padmakumar
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Not Granted

Description:

Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for partition

Evidence:

No cooperation with Advocate Commissioner

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification