Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Execution Petition No. 91 of 2016

Case between Cheracham Veettil Maliyekkal Saidu Muhammed et al vs Jameela et al regarding execution of property delivery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V., B.A., LL.B., Munsiff
Order Date
2016-08-22
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Mon, 08/22/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Execution petition filed by petitioners under order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure resulted in property delivery being effected and the case closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The property delivery was effected as per the petition filed by the petitioners under Order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The property delivery was effected as per the petition filed by the petitioners under Order 21 Rule 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. Delivery effected. EP Closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Cheracham Veettil Maliyekkal Saidu Muhammed
Relation
Deceased Plaintiff
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandanaparambil Beenamol
Party Age
42
Relation
Wife of Deceased Plaintiff
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dalharooth
Party Age
17
Relation
Minor Plaintiff
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Diyal Rosh
Party Age
14
Relation
Minor Plaintiff
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Danariyu
Party Age
11
Relation
Minor Plaintiff
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
55
Relation
Wife of P.A. Abooti
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
46
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beeyutti
Party Age
75
Relation
Wife of Muhammad Kutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. K. T. Ajayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Smt. Nisha, S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Property Delivery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Property delivery effected as per EP 91/2016
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery effected. EP Closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cheracham Veettil Maliyekkal Saidu Muhammed et al vs Jameela et al regarding execution of property delivery
Case Code Year
Case between Cheracham Veettil Maliyekkal Saidu Muhammed et al vs Jameela et al regarding execution of property delivery

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 08/22/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/22/2016 - 12:00
From
Mon, 08/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Wed, 08/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sreenivasan vs Ashraf regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheruvalappil Abdu vs Cheruvalappil Muhammed regarding financial settlement
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Subair et al regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Khalid vs Liyakkathali regarding payment dispute
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Irudukavil Shajan vs Chirakkal Moideenkutty regarding payment dispute
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won