RPIA 24/2024 in OS 70/2020

Case between Cheekkaprath Mariyam et al vs Kadavath Ayissa et al regarding petition not pressed.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan. B

Order Date

2025-07-10

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Cheekkaprath Mariyam and Kizhakkayil Kunhabdulla are the petitioners. They filed a petition which was ultimately not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Case

Final Judgment

The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, RPIA dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Cheekkaprath Mariyam
Party Age: 60
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kizhakkayil Kunhabdulla
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kadavath Ayissa
Party Age: 62
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kadavath Haseenaa
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pilarayil Kunham
Party Age: 75
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pilarayil Kunhali
Party Age: 64
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pilarayil Nafeesu
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. N. M. Kuttikrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Abdul Latheef. V. K
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

RPIA dismissed as not pressed.

Evidence: