Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 238 /2024

Case between Charles Dias vs Marshal D’Cunha et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Charles Dias, challenges the election of the 1st defendant, Marshal D’Cunha, to the post of President-in-Chief of the 3rd defendant, arguing that the 1st defendant is ineligible due to having held the position of General Secretary for over the allowed consecutive terms. The case seeks a declaration that the election was invalid and a prohibitory injunction against the 1st defendant from holding the contested post.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the 1st defendant was ineligible to contest the election for the post of President-in-Chief and the election was declared void. The court also issued a permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant from holding the position and ordered the defendants to pay costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 1st defendant from holding the post of president in chief of the 3rd defendant union and discharging any functions and responsibilities thereof in that capacity.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the 1st defendant had violated the provisions regarding eligibility set forth in Clause 8 of the Articles of Association of the 3rd defendant union.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) It is declared that 1st defendant is incompetent to contest the post of president in chief of 3rd defendant union in the election held on 05.03.2023 as per clause 8 of Articles of Association of 3rd defendant union. 2) 1st defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from holding the post of president in chief of 3rd defendant union and discharging any functions and responsibilities thereof in that capacity. 3) Defendants shall pay the costs to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Charles Dias (73 years years) Tinaar Dale, Major Road, Vytilla, Ernakulam- 682019

Defendants

Marshal D’Cunha (54 years years) Illickal House, Near Anglo Indian School, Edakochi- 682010 Advocate Vimal Raj (Age not specified years) G-7 Ground Floor, City Plaza, Perumanoor, Kochi- 682015 The Union of Anglo Indian Association (Reg. No. 9/1953) (Age not specified years) M G Road, Perumanoor, Kochi- 682015

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the 1st defendant is incompetent to contest the post of president in chief of the 3rd defendant union.
Evidence:
It is declared that 1st defendant is incompetent to contest the post of president in chief of 3rd defendant union in the election held on 05.03.2023 as per clause 8 of Articles of Association of 3rd defendant union.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 1st defendant from holding the post of president in chief and discharging any functions.
Evidence:
1st defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from holding the post of president in chief of 3rd defendant union and discharging any functions and responsibilities thereof in that capacity.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Memorandum association of 3rd defendant Union
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced as part of the plaintiff's evidence regarding the governance of the union.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Articles of Association of the Union of Anglo Indian Association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Central to the plaintiff's claims regarding the ineligibility of the 1st defendant to contest for election.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: True copy of letter sent by the plaintiff to the 2nd defendant along with postal receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Expresses the plaintiff's objections to the 1st defendant's candidacy.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of print out of the email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's objections against the election process.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of the letter issued to the 2nd defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further illustrates the plaintiff's communication regarding the election objections.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases