Case Summary
Chandrasekharan Nair. V is the plaintiff who has been continuously absent from the case, while N. Chandrakumari is the defendant. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence from the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent from the proceedings.
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent from the proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent from the proceedings.
The court found that the plaintiff was continuously absent from the proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is continuously absent in the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandrasekharan Nair. V
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N. Chandrakumari
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sajin. S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. T. S. Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Smita. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is continuously absent in the case. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023