Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1122/2022

Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding Civil Suit

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chandralekha and others filed a civil suit against Rugmini Ammal and others. The suit was regarding certain claims which, after hearing, the court found to be without merit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as no court fees had been paid and earlier time had already been granted. Both parties were represented during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as no court fees had been paid and earlier time had already been granted. Both parties were represented during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandralekha
Party Age
71
Relation
D/o late Saradha & W/o Gopalan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o late Saradha
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayakumar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o late Saradha
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latheswary
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o late Saradha
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SureshBabu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o late Saradha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rugmini Ammal
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o late Parameswara Iyer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha Sukumaran
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o late Sukumaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulu @ SreepriyaSukumaran
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o late Sukumaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulith Sukumaran
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o late Sukumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Praisheel Prakasam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manoj Kumar M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashwin Antony Ambat
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected as no BCF was paid and earlier time had already been granted.
Evidence:
Both sides represented. No BCF paid as earlier time had already been granted. Hence, suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding Civil Suit
Case Code Year
Case between Chandralekha et al vs Rugmini Ammal et al regarding Civil Suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won