I.A No. 1/2025 in OS No. 55 / 2025

Case between Chacko vs Paul Varghese et al regarding Ad-interim injunction

Court

THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY

Judge

Smt.Sirsha N.A

Order Date

2025-09-09

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involving Chacko against Paul Varghese and others regarding ad-interim injunction to prevent trespassing and damage to property

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Ad-interim injunction

Final Judgment

An ad-interim exparte injunction order was passed in favor of the plaintiff

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the affidavit and the documents produced. I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chacko
Party Age: 84
Relation: S/o Varghese Vettuvazhy Puthenpurayil

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Paul Varghese
Party Age: 72
Relation: S/o Varghese Mandapathil

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Varghese Mandapathil
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o Paul Varghese Mandapathil

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T.C.Baby Thekumchery
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.C.Paulose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Basil Kurian Baby
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P.G Subhash
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Issuance of ad-interim exparte injunction order

Evidence:

Irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner / plaintiff

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Used to support the petition for an ad-interim injunction

Reference:

Case Classification