Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.609/2021

Case between C.G. Anilkumar vs Neelakandan Nambeesan regarding rejection of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.G. Anilkumar filed a suit against Neelakandan Nambeesan. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the suit was rejected due to lack of representation and failure to pay court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to their absence and lack of representation during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.G. Anilkumar (59 years years) C/o Sajitha Anilkumar, Chettiparambil House, P.J. Antony Road, Palarivattom, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 025

Defendants

Neelakandan Nambeesan (45 years years) Kazhakapurayil, Chuttupadukara, Manimala road, Edapally P.O, Pin – 600 051

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases