Case Summary
C.G. Anilkumar filed a suit against Neelakandan Nambeesan. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the suit was rejected due to lack of representation and failure to pay court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to their absence and lack of representation during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff is absent. No representation. No balance court fee paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.G. Anilkumar
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neelakandan Nambeesan
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.C.Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.J.Gladis
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.G. Anilkumar vs Neelakandan Nambeesan regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between C.G. Anilkumar vs Neelakandan Nambeesan regarding rejection of suit