Case Summary
This case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants related to a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs are represented by their counsel while the defendants also have legal representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff absent and dismissed the suit for default. The counsel for the plaintiff had no instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide instructions for the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, represented. Counsel submitted that no instruction from plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 22nd day of November, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi
- Relation
- Rep. by President
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanmukharani, Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vasudevan, Secretary, Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayan, Khajanji, Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- President, Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Trust
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajendran Pillai, President, Cantonment Sreekrishnaswami Kshetra Trust
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S.S.Sunil
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Vimalnath R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sumith Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Declaration regarding the suit filed by the plaintiff
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. Counsel submitted that no instruction from plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction requested by the plaintiff
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/S 26, O.VII, Rule 1-7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi et al vs President, Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Trust et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Samrakshna Samithi et al vs President, Cantonment Sreekrishna Swamy Kshethra Trust et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction