Case Summary
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, represented by its manager, filed a suit against the defendant, Unnikrishnan. S. The court dismissed the suit for default as no steps were taken by the plaintiff despite opportunities given.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff did not take necessary steps in the case. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. Pronounced in the open court on this the 21 st day of November, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank (East While Syndicate Bank)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan. S
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Praveen. C.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Unnikrishnan. S regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Unnikrishnan. S regarding suit dismissal for default.