Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Suresh Babu regarding court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required court fees as directed.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required court fees as directed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required court fees as directed.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required court fees as directed.
Supporting Evidence
No representation from the plaintiff was made during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non remittance of balance court fee if though directed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parvathy. R. Babu
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh Babu
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.S.V.Sreeja
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Reshma. S. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non remittance of balance court fee if though directed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Suresh Babu regarding non-remittance of balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Suresh Babu regarding non-remittance of balance court fee