Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1715/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Sumith R.S regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months
Case Code No.
1715
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank has filed a suit against Sumith R.S for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite several reminders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a decree in favor of Canara Bank for the recovery of the loan amount owed by Sumith R.S. The defendant was found liable for failing to repay the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,42,852/- with 6% interest and costs from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a decree in favor of Canara Bank for the recovery of the loan amount owed by Sumith R.S. The defendant was found liable for failing to repay the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan and the defendant's failure to repay.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹4,42,852/- is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,42,852/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty-Two only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Principal Officer/Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumith R.S
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application Form for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs), Original Sanction Memorandum, Original Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation, Original Acknowledgments of Debt and Security, Bank statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Binu S.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kiran Babu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,42,852/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,42,852/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty-Two only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form for Micro and Small Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original loan application form signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original sanction memorandum dated 25/05/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement-cum-Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original agreement executed by the defendant for hypothecation.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original acknowledgment dated 20/05/2020, recognizing the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original acknowledgment dated 13/05/2023, confirming the outstanding debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified bank statement for the defendant’s loan account, covering the loan period.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 05/25/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won