Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1346/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Sri. Rajesh K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration
approximately-1 year
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Canara Bank seeking to recover a loan amount from Sri. Rajesh K.K, who failed to repay the loan. The bank claims that the defendant owes a total of ₹5,29,121.06.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹5,29,121.06 with interest at 6% per annum. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay ₹5,29,121.06 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹5,29,121.06 with interest at 6% per annum. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved with uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved with uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 5,29,121.06/- (Rupees five lakhs twenty nine thousand one hundred and twenty one and zero six paise only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Danny Babu
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Rajesh K.K
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application form for loans, Quotation, Sanction letter, Letter of undertaking, Deed of hypothecation, Office copy of lawyer notice, Acknowledgment of debt and security (multiple dates), Computer print out of statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V. Prakasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.B. Shrilatha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 5,29,121.06/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 5,29,121.06/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application form for loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim that the defendant availed a loan from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Quotation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides details related to the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the approval of the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms agreed upon by the defendant regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document secures the loan against assets.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal notice issued to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves that the notice was sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document reaffirms the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves to reaffirm the debt acknowledgment by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt and security dated
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a dated acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Computer print out of statement of account for the period from 01.01.2010 to 30.09.2024
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides a detailed account statement reflecting the amounts owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sri. Rajesh K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sri. Rajesh K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won