Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 694/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Sobu N.S regarding Suit for money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-18
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking repayment of loans from the defendant, Sobu N.S, who failed to repay amounts due under an overdraft and term loan agreements. The court has ruled in favor of the plaintiff after the defendant did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay a total amount of 7,35,330/- along with interest to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay a total amount of 7,35,330/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay a total amount of 7,35,330/- along with interest to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of litigation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents provided by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 7,35,330/- with 9% interest per annum on the principal amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sobu N.S
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction Memorandum, Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation, Debt restructuring agreement, Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 43169450001504, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 43169160000781
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Dileepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Sumithra
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Karthik Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank's request for recovery of outstanding loan amounts.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is entitled for a decree for realization of the amounts due under the loan accounts as prayed for herein.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Interest on the principal amounts outstanding.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the decree amount from the defendant and from his assets with post decretal interest @ 6% per annum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sanction of the working capital term loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement securing the working capital term loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the sanction of the term loan after restructuring.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement securing the term loan facility post restructuring.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Debt Restructuring Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement outlining the terms for restructuring the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant for recovery of outstanding amounts.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: A/d card of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the term loan showing outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account for the working capital term loan showing outstanding balance.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sobu N.S regarding Suit for money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sobu N.S regarding Suit for money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 09/03/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won