Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sivasekhar B.R and Radha.K. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to take necessary steps.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to take any steps to issue summons to the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to lack of action by the plaintiff.
The court dismissed the case due to lack of action by the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to lack of action by the plaintiff.
The court dismissed the case due to lack of action by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Since no proper steps seen taken till date to issue summons to the defendant, the suit is dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivasekhar B.R
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Radha. K
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Ajesh. B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to no proper steps taken to issue summons to the defendant.
Evidence:
Since no proper steps seen taken till date to issue summons to the defendant,the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023