Case Summary
Canara Bank filed an execution petition against Shiljith T regarding recovery. The court dismissed the petition for default due to no representation from the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Rep.by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shiljith T
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- Proprietor, M/s. Bitroot IT Solutions
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abdul Jaleel Onath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
EP dismissed for default
Evidence:
No representation for Decree holder. No steps taken. EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Shiljith T regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Shiljith T regarding execution petition