Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank represented by its manager Nidhin and defendant Samuel.M. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Samuel.M
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.N.R.Rajani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Samuel.M regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Samuel.M regarding dismissal of suit