Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sajitha.S and Shalini.S. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no steps taken in the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps in the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and no steps seen taken.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajitha.S
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shalini.S
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no steps taken.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Sajitha.S et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Sajitha.S et al regarding dismissal for default.