Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.57/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Saji J regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Judge
Smt. Kavya S. S
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months 12 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is suing Saji J, the proprietor of A.B.S Vegitables, for the repayment of a loan of ₹2,00,000 that was defaulted. The loan was sanctioned on June 11, 2020, and despite multiple demands, Saji J failed to repay the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,62,902 along with interest. The plaintiff was also awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹2,62,902/- to the plaintiff bank with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,62,902 along with interest. The plaintiff was also awarded costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence proved that the defendant had taken a loan of ₹2,00,000 and defaulted in repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence proved that the defendant had taken a loan of ₹2,00,000 and defaulted in repayment.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged testimony of PW1 proved the case of the plaintiff. There is no contra evidence to disprove the case of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows; 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹2,62,902/- to the plaintiff bank with interest @ 7.95% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of judgment and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of judgment till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji J
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application (Ext.A1), Sanction memorandum (Ext.A2), Pro-note (Ext.A3), Loan agreement (Ext.A4), Lawyer notice (Ext.A5), Postal receipt (Ext.A6), Postal acknowledgment (Ext.A7), Certified copy of account ledger (Ext.A8)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu Stephen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony Joseph
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am of the view that plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹2,62,902/- to the plaintiff bank.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹2,62,902/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand Nine Hundred and Two only) to the plaintiff bank with interest @ 7.95% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of judgment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as evidence of the loan application filed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates the approval of the loan by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the promissory note executed by the defendant evidencing the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan agreement entered into by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a notice sent to the defendant regarding the non-repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides proof of dispatch of the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the defendant received the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of Account Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding amount due from the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Saji J regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Saji J regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Thu, 06/11/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between IDBI BANK LIMITED vs Smt. Asha S Panicker regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI BANK LIMITED vs Sri. Joseph Antony regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI BANK LIMITED vs Smt. Marykutty Joseph regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ajith Babu et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Marit Mahima Mathew et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won