Case Summary
This case involves Canara Bank, represented by its manager Athul Shaji, and the defendant Sajan K. Thomas. The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and representation in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent, and there was no representation or requisite balance court fee filed.
The plaintiff was absent, and there was no representation or requisite balance court fee filed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent, and there was no representation or requisite balance court fee filed.
The plaintiff was absent, and there was no representation or requisite balance court fee filed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. No representation. No Balance court fee remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajan K.Thomas
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. S.V.Sreeja
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Retnamani.B.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023