Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 08/2023

Case between The Canara Bank vs Rahila Beevi.N. regarding suit for realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Canara Bank has filed a suit against Rahila Beevi.N. for the realization of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant defaulted on a term loan obtained due to financial difficulties arising from the Covid-19 pandemic.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,15,888.82/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was ordered to pay the costs of the suit as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving the case with sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A9 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,15,888.82/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty eight and Paise Eighty Two Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant and from her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahila Beevi.N.
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Authorized letter, Loan application, Sanction letter, Letter of undertaking, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation, Pronote, Advocate notice, Postal receipt, Attested copy of statement of account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith A. Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Abdul Shahan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,15,888.82/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty eight and Paise Eighty Two Only) together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorizes the plaintiff's representative to act on behalf of the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This application form details the loan request made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the sanction of the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter outlines the defendant's agreement to the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the hypothecation of assets as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note confirms the defendant's obligation to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to demand repayment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the delivery of the advocate notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement shows the transactions and outstanding balance of the defendant's loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rahila Beevi.N. regarding suit for realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rahila Beevi.N. regarding suit for realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 06/30/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. vs Nazimudeen.A. regarding Realisation of Money
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharashtra et al vs Noorunnisa et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Karnataka Bank et al vs Riyas Hassan et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Indian Bank, Kadappakkada Branch vs Rasheed.H. @ Rasheedkutty et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Thulasi Swayam Sahaya Sangham et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won