Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No 1991/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Pathumma Kani et al regarding default in suit dismissal

Court
IN THE COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.. Manesh.S.V, Additional Munsiff-I
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, represented by Rajeswari.S, filed a suit against defendants Pathumma Kani, Gulam Muhammed.T, and Raheena Beevi. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not represent the case despite having sufficient opportunities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take any steps or representation, leading to a default judgment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to take any steps or representation, leading to a default judgment.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff despite sufficient opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default. Pronounced in the open court on this the 03rd day of December 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathumma Kani
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gulam Muhammed.T
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raheena Beevi
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Saji.S.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
No representation for plaintiff. No steps taken till date despite grant of sufficient opportunities and ample time.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Pathumma Kani et al regarding default in suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Pathumma Kani et al regarding default in suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Aradhi Restaurant regarding rejection of plaint
Court of Principal Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won