Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.1573/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Nishad.S et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, seeks to recover a loan amount of Rs. 7,08,401/- from the defendants for a credit facility granted for a textile business. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,08,401/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest. The suit was decreed with costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff convincingly proved the existence of the debt through its Manager's unchallenged testimony.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff convincingly proved the existence of the debt through its Manager's unchallenged testimony.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendants owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,08,401/- from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nishad.S
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 03/08/2013, Composite Hypothecation Agreement dated 03/08/2013, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security dated 10/01/2020, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security dated 22/09/2022, Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreena.L.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize ₹7,08,401/- from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹7,08,401/- from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize interest at the rate of 12.20% per annum with monthly rests from 01/10/2024 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 12.20% per annum with monthly rests from 01/10/2024 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the loan application submitted by the defendants, dated 03/08/2013, which forms the basis of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the terms of the loan granted to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document, dated 10/01/2020, serves as an acknowledgment of the debt agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document, dated 22/09/2022, is another acknowledgment of the debt by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the details of the amounts due to the plaintiff from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Nishad.S et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Nishad.S et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 08/03/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won