Case Summary
Canara Bank is the plaintiff, while M/s IX Green LLP and others are the defendants. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's inability to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s IX Green LLP
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G. Pradeep Kumar
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyam Kumar. S
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha Krishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s IX Green LLP et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s IX Green LLP et al regarding dismissal of suit.