Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.389/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Green Health Care et al regarding rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against multiple defendants including M/s Green Health Care for the rejection of the plaint. The court noted the absence of the plaintiff and the non-payment of the BCF despite several opportunities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the BCF.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the BCF.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and failed to follow court procedures.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and failed to follow court procedures.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff has no representation. Name of plaintiff and Counsel called out in open court. They are absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Green Health Care
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.Vidhya. M.
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Prasoon M.S
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri Latheesh Raj. K.P
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.Sanitha.
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. P.K. Narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Razal Rahiman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jyothi. R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Green Health Care et al regarding rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Green Health Care et al regarding rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank et al vs Leela.C.K regarding petition for decree transmission.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs BABEESH.K et al regarding realisation of amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sunena.C et al regarding plaint rejection
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/S UCO Bank vs Mr. Akhil raj.O et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won