Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 452/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre regarding realisation of money.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam.
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-11-25
Duration
approximately-6 years 10 months
Case Closed
Tue, 11/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount due from the defendants, M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre. The defendants allegedly defaulted on a business loan of Rs. 2,00,000/- and the plaintiff is claiming the outstanding amount with interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,25,042.86/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case by providing sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1 to A8 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,25,042.86/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ammu Suresh
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o.Ratheesh P.R.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammad Sidhik
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o.Maidheen Kunju
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for credit facility dated 11/07/2019, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 12/07/2019, Sanction letter dated 12/07/2019, Letter of proprietorship dated 12/07/2019, Acknowledgment of debt dated 04/02/2022, Office copy of legal notice dated 04/05/2023, Postal receipt dated 04/05/2023, Account statement from the period 01/07/2019 to 28/04/2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.AbdulKhalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasree K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nazrin A.Khalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Santhi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 2,25,042.86 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.2,25,042.86/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
(ii) The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for credit facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is evidence that the defendant applied for a business loan from the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement details the terms under which the loan was sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms that the loan was officially sanctioned by the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes that the second defendant is the proprietor of the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This acknowledgment indicates the second defendant recognized the debt on 04/02/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants demanding repayment of the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt confirms that the legal notice was sent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides details of the loan account and transactions related to it.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Fathima Garments and Stitching Centre regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 07/12/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. vs Nazimudeen.A. regarding Realisation of Money
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharashtra et al vs Noorunnisa et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Karnataka Bank et al vs Riyas Hassan et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Indian Bank, Kadappakkada Branch vs Rasheed.H. @ Rasheedkutty et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Thulasi Swayam Sahaya Sangham et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won