Case Summary
This case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff represented by Aneesh, and Mohammed Shiras as the defendant. The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the balance of court fees despite repeated opportunities.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to failure to remit the necessary court fees after multiple opportunities were provided.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with court procedures regarding the payment of court fees.
The plaintiff did not comply with court procedures regarding the payment of court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with court procedures regarding the payment of court fees.
The plaintiff did not comply with court procedures regarding the payment of court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance of Court Fee remitted even after repeated opportunities. No application seen filed for enlargement of time.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected u/o 7 R11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohammed Shiras
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Viswambharan.V.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected for failure to remit the balance of court fee.
Evidence:
No Balance of Court Fee remitted even after repeated opportunities. No application seen filed for enlargement of time. Hence Plaintiff rejected u/o 7 R11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Shiras regarding court fee non-remittance
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Mohammed Shiras regarding court fee non-remittance