Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1896/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Maya C.M et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh. S.V
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
approximately-8 years 11 days
Case Closed
Thu, 11/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Maya C.M and Cisily.N.S for the recovery of money loaned for an aquarium business. The defendants failed to repay the loan amount and were set ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,63,101/- with interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing recovery of the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established its claim through unchallenged testimonies and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The uncontroverted averments in the plaint and the facts sworn in the affidavit coupled with the accompanying documents go on to prove that the defendants have availed loan facility from the plaintiff Bank.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs: Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,63,101/- with interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maya C.M
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cisily.N.S
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application Form, Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Guarantee agreement, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Computer print of statement of accounts
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs: 1.Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,63,101/- (Rupees One lakh sixty three thousand one hundred and one only) with interest at the rate of 10.50% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants jointly and severally and their assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence used to establish the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referenced to demonstrate the security for the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document showed that the second defendant guaranteed the loan taken by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to confirm the defendants' acknowledgment of the debt owed to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computer Print of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided the statement of accounts showing the outstanding amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Maya C.M et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Maya C.M et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 11/08/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won