Case Summary
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, represented by its Senior Manager, filed a suit against M Poroskhan and S Thirumalai Kumar. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M Poroskhan
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S Thirumalai Kumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Nithin M K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M Poroskhan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M Poroskhan et al regarding dismissal of suit