Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 727/2020

Case between Canara Bank vs Lissy Kuriachan et al regarding compromise agreement

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Lissy Kuriachan and Mathew Kuriachan as defendants. It concerns a compromise agreement that was filed and accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise agreement and decreed the suit according to its terms. The court fee is to be refused as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise agreement and decreed the suit according to its terms. The court fee is to be refused as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Compromise agreement accepted and lawful terms were established.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Compromise agreement accepted and lawful terms were established.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise Agreement accepted and terms are lawful IA 4/25 allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement. Compromise Agreement shall form part of decree counsel.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lissy Kuriachan
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew Kuriachan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise Agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Mannanal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jainamma Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
J Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Evidence:
Compromise Agreement filed. Compromise agreement accepted and terms are lawful IA 4/25 allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Lissy Kuriachan et al regarding compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Lissy Kuriachan et al regarding compromise agreement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/27/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Joy Thomas regarding settlement at mediation
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Joy Thomas regarding settlement at mediation
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Rekha Prasad et al regarding mediation settlement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cherian K Joseph vs The CSB Bank Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shiji Mani vs The CSB Bank limited et al regarding Suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won