Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 433/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs First Care Medicals et al regarding suit for money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff seeking repayment of a loan amount from First Care Medicals and its proprietor Afini Ashraf. The defendants failed to make proper repayments and the suit was filed after the loan account became non-performing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit directing the defendants to pay the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay an amount of 5,81,633/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 5,81,633/- (Rupees Five lakh Eighty one thousand Six hundred and Thirty three only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) SME Ernakulam Branch, Kodai Towers, Near Changampuzha park, Edapally, Ernakulam – 682 024

Defendants

First Care Medicals (Age not specified years) Door no. 1/310-A2 Eloor Dipo Junction, Eloor North, Udyogamandal P.O, Pin – 683 501 Afini Ashraf (33 years) Vallaipilly house, Padamugal Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants to pay an amount of Rs 5,81,633/- with interest
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 5,81,633/- (Rupees Five lakh Eighty one thousand Six hundred and Thirty three only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Authorization letter issued by Canara Bank
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Sanction Memorandum
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the request for overdraft facilities
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cash credit agreement
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original pronote
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Application for Renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original application for renewal
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Loan Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan sanction memorandum
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original letter of Renewal
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original letter of undertaking
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the recall notice
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card of the notice issued to the 1st defendant
Reference:
Ext.A13(a)
Document Type: Returned Cover of Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the returned cover of the notice issued to the 2nd defendant
Reference:
Ext.A13(b)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 11/23/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases