Case Summary
Canara Bank Thottilpalam Branch filed an execution petition against Amal Toms and Tomi alias Devassia. The petition was dismissed as the judgment debtors were reported not to be present in the jurisdiction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the judgment debtors in the jurisdiction.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition could not proceed as the judgment debtors were reported not to be present in the jurisdiction.
The execution petition could not proceed as the judgment debtors were reported not to be present in the jurisdiction.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition could not proceed as the judgment debtors were reported not to be present in the jurisdiction.
The execution petition could not proceed as the judgment debtors were reported not to be present in the jurisdiction.
Supporting Evidence
JD1 reported to be in Kottayam. Hence, EP cannot be executed against JD1. JD2 reported to be not in Amsom. Hence, EP cannot be executed against JD2 as well.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, EP is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank Thottilpalam Branch
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amal Toms
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tomi alias Devassia
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Ratheeshkumar KK
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Amal Toms
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Tomi alias Devassia
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025