Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Thansi.A. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was not present during the trial.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the trial.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank, Karikkakom Branch
- Relation
- represented by its Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thansi.A
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- W/o Late Shajimon.M
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasanth.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.Sethu Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Arun.A.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
As case is included in list for trial today and as plaintiff is not present when case is taken up for adducing plaintiff evidence. Suit stands dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank, Karikkakom Branch, Thiruvananthapuram vs Thansi.A regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank, Karikkakom Branch, Thiruvananthapuram vs Thansi.A regarding dismissal of suit