Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank, Kanjirappally Branch seeking restoration of a suit. The court found that necessary steps had already been taken by the petitioner/plaintiff, leading to the restoration of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The suit is restored.
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Canara Bank, stating that the necessary steps had been taken.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The necessary steps were taken by the petitioner/plaintiff.
The necessary steps were taken by the petitioner/plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The necessary steps were taken by the petitioner/plaintiff.
The necessary steps were taken by the petitioner/plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Considering that the steps are taken the petition is allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The Restoration Petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank, Kanjirappally Branch
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishnu T. Nair
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joy K. George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The Restoration Petition is allowed.
Evidence:
Considering that the steps are taken the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank, Kanjirappally Branch vs Vishnu T. Nair regarding restoration of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank, Kanjirappally Branch vs Vishnu T. Nair regarding restoration of suit.