Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1347/2024

Case between Canara Bank et al vs M/s Muscle Factory Gym et al regarding money recovery

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 7 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against M/s Muscle Factory Gym and its proprietor for recovery of a loan amount due. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite being served notices and have been classified as a non-performing asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants were found liable for the loan amount due to failure to repay and absence in court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay an amount of 9,36,322.78/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documentation submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 9,36,322.78/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Thirty-Six Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty-Two and Paise Seventy-Eight only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Woodlands Annex, Eloor road, North Kalamassery, Ernakulam – 683 104 Danny Babu (32 years) Oravil house, Kadayiruppu P.O, Kolencherry, Aikkaranadu north village, Kunnathunadu taluk Sunil S (35 years) Kalatharayil house, Peringala P.O, Mavelikara, Pin – 690 559

Defendants

M/s Muscle Factory Gym (Age not specified years) no. 6/193, Kottapuram junction, Alangad, Aluva, Pin – 683 511 Jishnu J (29 years) Palathinkal house, U.C.College P.O, Aluva, Pin – 683 102

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 9,36,322.78/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Thirty-Six Thousand Three Hundred and Twenty-Two and Paise Seventy-Eight only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till realisation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Application for Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the loan application by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original letter of sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that provides evidence of the approved loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original deed of Hypothecation Re-machinery
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that secures the loan against machinery.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original request letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the request for disbursal of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original request letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the subsequent request for loan disbursal.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document acknowledging the outstanding loan liability.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the demand for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt of the notice issued to the 1st defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the delivery of the notice to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt of the notice issued to the 2nd defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the delivery of the notice to the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9(b)
Document Type: A/d card of the notice issued to the 1st defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document verifying acknowledgment of receipt of notice by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10(a)
Document Type: A/d card of the notice issued to the 2nd defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document verifying acknowledgment of receipt of notice by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10(b)
Document Type: True copy of the account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/29/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases