Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Rajalakshmi.I.R. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and no representation was made, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
As no steps taken suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank)
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajalakshmi.I.R
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Praveen.C.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank) vs Rajalakshmi.I.R regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank) vs Rajalakshmi.I.R regarding dismissal for default