Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 128/2019

Case between Calvin Clint vs Jeesan Varghese et al regarding dismissal of suit for absence

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Calvin Clint is the plaintiff and Jeesan Varghese along with others are the defendants. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's repeated absence without representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. There was specific direction for plaintiff to appear. Plaintiff is repeatedly absent without representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Calvin Clint
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jeesan Varghese @ Jeesan M.V
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smijo Varghese
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tijo Varghese
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Padmaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. O Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sebastian Tomy P. T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S Latha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Razali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Liya Thankachan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kurian Maxi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's repeated absence without representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. There was specific direction for plaintiff to appear. Plaintiff is repeatedly absent without representation. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calvin Clint vs Jeesan Varghese et al regarding dismissal of suit for absence
Case Code Year
Case between Calvin Clint vs Jeesan Varghese et al regarding dismissal of suit for absence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won