Case Summary
Calicut City Service Co- operative Bank Ltd filed an execution petition against respondents Pushpalatha and Premalatha. The petitioner sought to enforce a decree, but the execution petition was not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was not pressed, leading to the closure of the case.
Key Reasoning:
Not clearly mentioned
Not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not clearly mentioned
Not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EP is not pressed. Hence EP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Calicut City Service Co- operative Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Rep by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pushpalatha
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Premalatha
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Tennison Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Smt. M.K. sareena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calicut City Service Co- operative Bank Ltd vs Pushpalatha et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Calicut City Service Co- operative Bank Ltd vs Pushpalatha et al regarding execution petition