Case Summary
The case involves Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank as the petitioner and two respondents, Reshma.K.R and Thankamma.N. The decree holder represented in court did not press the execution petition, which led to the case being closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was not pressed by the decree holder and was subsequently closed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EP closed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No. D 2777
- Relation
- Rep by General Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reshma.K.R
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankamma.N
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Tennison Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- A.J. Emmanuel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Decree holder not pressed EP
Evidence:
Decree holder not pressed EP. Endorsed in petition. EP closed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No. D 2777 et al vs Reshma.K.R et al regarding EP
Case Code Year
Case between Calicut City Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No. D 2777 et al vs Reshma.K.R et al regarding EP