O.S. No.266/2025

Case between C V Sabu vs V C Lakshmanan regarding temporary injunction

Court

COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany

Order Date

2025-03-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C V Sabu is the petitioner in this case, seeking a temporary injunction against V C Lakshmanan, the respondent. The court found that the petitioner had not paid rent regularly, leading to the decision to vacate the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court vacated the ad-interim injunction against the petitioner due to non-payment of rent.

Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner had not paid rent regularly.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner had not paid rent regularly.

Supporting Evidence

Satisfied that petitioner has not paid rent regularly and there is arrears of rent.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence ad-interim injunction granted is vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C V Sabu
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: V C Lakshmanan
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P J Justine
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K B Rajesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: S B Premachandraprabhu
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Jose P Thomas
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Vacated

Description:

Ad-interim injunction granted is vacated

Evidence:

Satisfied that petitioner has not paid rent regularly and there is arrears of rent. Hence ad-interim injunction granted is vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification