Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 665 /2023

Case between C M Abdul Azeez vs Karunakaran Nair regarding a civil mediation agreement.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-12-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C M Abdul Azeez is the plaintiff and Karunakaran Nair is the defendant. The case was about a civil suit that was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed as per the mediation agreement, and the terms of the agreement were found to be lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of Court fee as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed as per the mediation agreement, and the terms of the agreement were found to be lawful. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of Mediation agreement are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per Mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C M Abdul Azeez
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karunakaran Nair
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K A Rasheed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P M Haris
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P K Nishad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per Mediation agreement
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per Mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court fee
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of Court fee as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C M Abdul Azeez vs Karunakaran Nair regarding a civil mediation agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between C M Abdul Azeez vs Karunakaran Nair regarding a civil mediation agreement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won