Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.112 /2014

Case between C I Mathew et al vs S M Prem et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-12-04
Duration
approximately-10 years 4 months
Case Closed
Wed, 12/04/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include C I Mathew and his two children, Roy Mathew and Mini Mathew. They filed a suit against S M Prem and two others but later decided to withdraw the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has dismissed the suit as withdrawn based on the plaintiffs' decision not to proceed any further.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has dismissed the suit as withdrawn based on the plaintiffs' decision not to proceed any further.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C I Mathew
Party Age
93
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Roy Mathew
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mini Mathew
Party Age
59
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S M Prem
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshan K Mathew
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dayna Mathew
Party Age
22
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh R Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjali N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saumya T S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M P Ramnath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Rajesh Kottakal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Uma R Kamath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhya S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayasankar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aju Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinu Chand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ragin Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhijith C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit may be dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C I Mathew et al vs S M Prem et al regarding withdrawal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between C I Mathew et al vs S M Prem et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Cochin
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/01/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/04/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won